Beware hubris

Here is Daniel Pipe's warning against getting ahead of ourselves in the Middle East:

I too welcome these developments, but more warily. Having been trained in Middle Eastern history makes me perhaps more aware of what can go wrong: **Yes, Mahmoud Abbas wishes to end the armed struggle against Israel but his call for a greater jihad against the "Zionist enemy" points to his intending another form of war to destroy Israel. **The Iraqi elections are bringing Ibrahim al-Jaafari, a pro-Iranian Islamist, to power. **Likewise, the Saudi elections proved a boon for the Islamist candidates. **Mubarak's promise is purely cosmetic; but should real presidential elections one day come to Egypt, Islamists will probably prevail there too. **Removing Syrian control in Lebanon could well lead to Hezbollah, a terrorist group, becoming the dominant power there. **Eliminating the hideous Assad dynasty could well bring in its wake an Islamist government in Damascus. Note a pattern? Other than the sui generis Palestinian case, one main danger threatens to undo the good news: that a too-quick removal of tyranny unleashes Islamist ideologues and opens their way to power. Sadly, Islamists uniquely have what it takes to win elections: the talent to develop a compelling ideology, the energy to found parties, the devotion to win supporters, the money to spend on electoral campaigns, the honesty to appeal to voters, and the will to intimidate rivals. This drive to power is nothing new. In 1979, Islamists exploited the shah's fall to take power in Iran. In 1992, they were on their way to win elections in Algeria. In 2002, they democratically took over in Turkey and Bangladesh. Removing Saddam Hussein, Husni Mubarak, Bashar Assad, and the Saudi princes is easier than convincing Middle Eastern Muslim peoples not to replace them with virulent Islamist ideologues.

The U.S.'s job at this point is clearly to advance but, as Elmer Fudd said, to be "vewy careful."